|
Lotus'
Foes Smell Blood in the Water |
5.1 |
 |
Lotus'
Foes Smell Blood in the Water, Internet Week |
It's going to take a lot more than free software
for Lotus to retain its huge cc:Mail installed base.
Though the IBM unit is expected to offer free Notes clients to its 14
million cc:Mail users to encourage migration, many shops are calling
for lower maintenance costs, better coexistence tools and more training.
Need further proof that these customers are in the catbird seat? The
looming presence of Microsoft and other cutthroat competitors could
result in even sweeter deals than Lotus' (see chart on page 63). It
promises to be a bloodbath that only benefits IT managers.
Typical among the customers who will exploit the situation is Sony Corp.
"I'm expecting benefits beyond free clients," said Vincent
Farinaro, manager of LAN/Office technology at Sony. "I expect some
offers from Microsoft, too. It could get bloody."
Microsoft is already devising its plan to snatch as many cc:Mail users
as possible. The company has dedicated a group on its Exchange team
to devise a plan to win those cc:Mail converts. An initial offer of
a 2-for-1 client swap was tabled after Microsoft learned Lotus would
be giving away clients, according to a source at Microsoft.
The number of organizations with aging cc:Mail networks that will subscribe
to the company's Domino theory by moving to the Domino/Notes platform
may be far lower than Lotus expects, observers said last week. Case
in point: Dale Johnson, of the Boston cc:Mail users group, predicted
70 percent of the 1,500 cc:Mail shops he consults with will move off
the Lotus platform.
"It might be too late for Lotus to pull a rabbit out of its hat
this time," said Johnson, who also is president of Johnson Consulting.
"It will take them at least a year to have tools and strategies
down pat and my clients need to have made their decisions by then."
Even with Lotus' enticements, it's going to be a hard sell, said Ron
Herardian, chief executive officer of Global System Services, a systems
integrator. In a survey of 300 customers, GSS is finding "most"
will move off cc:Mail in the next two to three years. More ominously,
"based on the initial feedback, they're not going to Domino,"
he said. More likely choices are Microsoft Exchange or Netscape Communicator
because both platforms offer more lightweight, efficient clients, he
added.
Despite this potential setback for Lotus, Domino/Notes is on a roll
with exponential growth. The company last month disclosed it now has
20.5 million clients, more than 2 million more than it had anticipated
by the end of 1997. Lotus sold 4 million licenses last quarter alone.
One fly in the ointment, however, has been a dissatisfied base of cc:Mail
users who have been looking for a smooth, cost-effective migration path
and frustrated by Lotus' failure to deliver it.
News of the free Notes client was reported late last month when Lotus
sources told InternetWeek the company will give free Notes 5.0 clients
to cc:Mail customers on maintenance contracts. Lotus insiders last week
said the Notes giveaway will begin with a client plug-in called R6D.
Both products are key to easing retraining and migration costs for
cc:Mail customers.
"Free is great, but free isn't free if you have $200,000 hidden
in a maintenance contract," said Marc Malacoff, manager of telecommunications
and networking for the M.W. Kellogg Company in Houston. "I need
some facts on costs before I go to management and try to sell them on
moving. Lotus has made the technical case but we need the business case
for moving."
The average maintenance fees charged by Lotus-figures confirmed by the
company- are $9 per cc:Mail user compared to $18 per seat for Domino/Notes
shops. Sources said Lotus will likely offer discounted maintenance contracts
to cc:Mail customers for the first two years after they migrate to Domino/Notes.
That's what cc:Mail customers said they need to keep them away from
the clutches of Microsoft's Exchange, Novell's GroupWise or Netscape/iPlanet
servers. At last month's Lotusphere conference, cc:Mail administrators
said they are tired of dealing with Notes migration and coexistence
tools that cause directory problems and administrative headaches.
"The core migration problems have never gone away and, in fact,
are just starting to get better," said GSS' Herardian.
The message is starting to sink in. Late last month, the company released
the DB8 Migration Tool, which includes enhanced Automatic Directory
Exchange features. This month it also will release cc:Mail MTA 2.0,
a coexistence tool that has suffered from major bugs in previous releases.
But the bulk of the migration strategy still needs to be articulated.
Steve Layne, vice pres-ident and general manager of Lotus messaging,
said last week, "We are pretty clear on what we want to do and
are finalizing those plans, but we have no details to announce."
Layne added that the "aggressive and attractive" plan for
a move to Domino/Notes would go beyond cc:Mail users and include legacy
shops served by systems like Microsoft Mail, IBM Office Vision and Digital
Equipment All-in- One.
IT managers know moving platforms won't just require new software, it
will require costly new hard-ware and network infrastructure.
"When you load Domino, it's a whole different ball game,"
said Tim Sloane, director of research for Internet infrastructure at
the Aberdeen Group. "The question for customers is, will that effort
be easier going to Domino or Exchange? The answer will be different
for everybody."
"It would be unfair to force us off a platform and then have us
pay large amounts of money to make the move," said Greg Chesser,
a network analyst at Ameripol Synpol Corp. "I think they're playing
the odds that cc:Mail customers are loyal. It will be interesting to
see how many stay."
Copyright (c) 1998 CMP Media Inc.
Internet Week -- 02-09-98, p. PG1
©1995-2003 by Global System
Services corporation (GSS). Portions of this material are copyright ©1995-1999
by Ron Herardian


©1995-2005 by Global System Services Corporation (GSS). Portions
of this material are copyright ©1995-1999 by Ron Herardian
|